<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for From Pucks to the Pitch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 20:55:35 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Coyotes Flying back to Winnipeg? by Gunaxin Links</title>
		<link>http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=1143&#038;cpage=1#comment-914</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunaxin Links</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 20:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=1143#comment-914</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Coyotes Flying back to Winnipeg?...&lt;/strong&gt;

This article has been featured on Gunaxin Links...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Coyotes Flying back to Winnipeg?&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This article has been featured on Gunaxin Links&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Re-evaluating the Phil Kessel Trade by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=888&#038;cpage=1#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:59:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=888#comment-329</guid>
		<description>I agree that they put a lot on the line and agree that in this day and age drafting is the key to building a team. I am apprehensive about giving up two first rounders as well. I just wanted to make the point that we shouldnt rush out to judge too quickly on deals that are not rental deals. 

But after a game like last night it just pains me to think about the future of this team without a solid stock of drafts. Im getting to the end of my rope. There is only so much a fan can endure. Burke says this team is built from the net out, that his style is to build a strong defence. But look at the games this year. They let in way too many goals. Scoring isnt the issue. They can score 3 or 4 goals in a game, but when you are letting 5 or 6 get past you its jsut impossible for these young guys to score enough to win. Their defence has been too painful to watch. Something has to give. I am starting to question the ability of Wilson to inspire his team.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that they put a lot on the line and agree that in this day and age drafting is the key to building a team. I am apprehensive about giving up two first rounders as well. I just wanted to make the point that we shouldnt rush out to judge too quickly on deals that are not rental deals. </p>
<p>But after a game like last night it just pains me to think about the future of this team without a solid stock of drafts. Im getting to the end of my rope. There is only so much a fan can endure. Burke says this team is built from the net out, that his style is to build a strong defence. But look at the games this year. They let in way too many goals. Scoring isnt the issue. They can score 3 or 4 goals in a game, but when you are letting 5 or 6 get past you its jsut impossible for these young guys to score enough to win. Their defence has been too painful to watch. Something has to give. I am starting to question the ability of Wilson to inspire his team.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Re-evaluating the Phil Kessel Trade by Mark Sutherland</title>
		<link>http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=888&#038;cpage=1#comment-317</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sutherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:47:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=888#comment-317</guid>
		<description>I understand the Kessel trade from the Leafs perspective.  The guy is a proven scorer in this league, and should remain one for the rest of his career, but I just feel they morgaged too much of the future in order to obtain him.  

The reason I raised the point of the Kessel trade is due to the fact that the Leafs have been beaten up for trading a potential first overall pick, but I really think Boston has been given a free ride over this trade.  Everyone is going on about how good this trade is from Boston&#039;s perspective because they are a good team that is going to get a high pick, but Boston has not actually been very good.  They were good with Kessel but are clearly missing his goals.  Kessel can be a gamebreaker, but you are right Mike, he does need to have the right players around him.  However, finding established players through trades and free-agency is an expensive appraoch to rebuilding your team, while drafting quality players allow a team to manage their cap a little easier.  

I also do not agree with the rush to judge the winners and losers of trades.  It was a bit ridiculous to see the Leafs declared huge winners of the trade with Calgary based on the fact that they won their first games since the trade, and Calgary lost their first game.  I actually like the Flames/Leafs trade for both teams.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand the Kessel trade from the Leafs perspective.  The guy is a proven scorer in this league, and should remain one for the rest of his career, but I just feel they morgaged too much of the future in order to obtain him.  </p>
<p>The reason I raised the point of the Kessel trade is due to the fact that the Leafs have been beaten up for trading a potential first overall pick, but I really think Boston has been given a free ride over this trade.  Everyone is going on about how good this trade is from Boston&#8217;s perspective because they are a good team that is going to get a high pick, but Boston has not actually been very good.  They were good with Kessel but are clearly missing his goals.  Kessel can be a gamebreaker, but you are right Mike, he does need to have the right players around him.  However, finding established players through trades and free-agency is an expensive appraoch to rebuilding your team, while drafting quality players allow a team to manage their cap a little easier.  </p>
<p>I also do not agree with the rush to judge the winners and losers of trades.  It was a bit ridiculous to see the Leafs declared huge winners of the trade with Calgary based on the fact that they won their first games since the trade, and Calgary lost their first game.  I actually like the Flames/Leafs trade for both teams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Re-evaluating the Phil Kessel Trade by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=888&#038;cpage=1#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 04:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=888#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Did you think its too early to assess this, or any other recent trades, let alone RE-evaluate the trade? The Leafs are looking to re-build for the future and the club is concerned with the long term. So although this season has been prety sad, the real impact of the trade(s) lies in the future - how the deals work out long term. Of course the Leafs have the psot season as a goal, but arent thinking just that short term. 

With respect to Kessel, I dont think anyone expected him to be a quick fix. Toronto needs more than his scoring touch alone to have a winning club. Moreover, you can&#039;t expect much from him unless he&#039;s got quality people around him, and Stajan wasn&#039;t that guy. Yeah he&#039;s struggled recently, but he is a young player with lots of potential, who&#039;s expected to be a part of the team for years to come, and we just dont know what the future holds for the Leafs. And of course, two frist round draft picks is a high price, especially going to a rival team. But there is always uncertainty with drafting players. There have been lots of guys drafted early on who just never produced as expected. 

So although the immediate future is a little bleak, we need to keep the bigger picture in perspective. So in all, I question whether its fair to really assess this trade until we see just how Kessel develops on the team or just how the draft picks pan out for Boston. I dont think we will have a clear idea of the impact of this trade, and the one&#039;s made Sunday, for a couple of seasons. The trades on Sunday will only be deemed a success if the Monster can learn and develop under JSG, or if Phaneuf can capture that spark he had out of the gate and if he develops how people expect him to. As far as the Leafs are concerned, I&#039;m holding off on weighing in over whether these trades made them winners or losers, because we just dont know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you think its too early to assess this, or any other recent trades, let alone RE-evaluate the trade? The Leafs are looking to re-build for the future and the club is concerned with the long term. So although this season has been prety sad, the real impact of the trade(s) lies in the future &#8211; how the deals work out long term. Of course the Leafs have the psot season as a goal, but arent thinking just that short term. </p>
<p>With respect to Kessel, I dont think anyone expected him to be a quick fix. Toronto needs more than his scoring touch alone to have a winning club. Moreover, you can&#8217;t expect much from him unless he&#8217;s got quality people around him, and Stajan wasn&#8217;t that guy. Yeah he&#8217;s struggled recently, but he is a young player with lots of potential, who&#8217;s expected to be a part of the team for years to come, and we just dont know what the future holds for the Leafs. And of course, two frist round draft picks is a high price, especially going to a rival team. But there is always uncertainty with drafting players. There have been lots of guys drafted early on who just never produced as expected. </p>
<p>So although the immediate future is a little bleak, we need to keep the bigger picture in perspective. So in all, I question whether its fair to really assess this trade until we see just how Kessel develops on the team or just how the draft picks pan out for Boston. I dont think we will have a clear idea of the impact of this trade, and the one&#8217;s made Sunday, for a couple of seasons. The trades on Sunday will only be deemed a success if the Monster can learn and develop under JSG, or if Phaneuf can capture that spark he had out of the gate and if he develops how people expect him to. As far as the Leafs are concerned, I&#8217;m holding off on weighing in over whether these trades made them winners or losers, because we just dont know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Major changes in Leaf Nation by Mark Sutherland</title>
		<link>http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=894&#038;cpage=1#comment-308</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sutherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 02:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=894#comment-308</guid>
		<description>Yeah the trade could work very well for Toronto.  Both Phaneuf and Giguere have huge upside, but it is just a matter of finding it.  Sometimes being traded is a wake-up call for a player, and I think that could happen in Phaneuf&#039;s case.  I agree the focus has to be on finding players up-front now.  Burke has brought in countless defensemen, and has also brought in a couple of goaltenders.  If they can&#039;t figure the poor defensive play out with the group they have then I feel Ron Wilson will have to go in the off-season, or early next year.  

Kaberle will be gone at some point.  Either by the deadline or before the draft when his no-trade cause is not apart of the equation.  It would just be nice if this team had some more draft picks in order to find some young talent up front, but there are some decent players to be had through trades, and I think Toronto will be active.  Ponikarovsky wil be traded befor the deadline and he should get at least a second round pick in return.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah the trade could work very well for Toronto.  Both Phaneuf and Giguere have huge upside, but it is just a matter of finding it.  Sometimes being traded is a wake-up call for a player, and I think that could happen in Phaneuf&#8217;s case.  I agree the focus has to be on finding players up-front now.  Burke has brought in countless defensemen, and has also brought in a couple of goaltenders.  If they can&#8217;t figure the poor defensive play out with the group they have then I feel Ron Wilson will have to go in the off-season, or early next year.  </p>
<p>Kaberle will be gone at some point.  Either by the deadline or before the draft when his no-trade cause is not apart of the equation.  It would just be nice if this team had some more draft picks in order to find some young talent up front, but there are some decent players to be had through trades, and I think Toronto will be active.  Ponikarovsky wil be traded befor the deadline and he should get at least a second round pick in return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Major changes in Leaf Nation by Mike Avery</title>
		<link>http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=894&#038;cpage=1#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 23:58:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=894#comment-307</guid>
		<description>Something had to be done.  Ian White is a bit of a tough loss since he finally played himself into a good defencemen and then the leafs trade him. Although he does pinch alot at bad times like the first shift of last nights flame&#039;s game.  Kaberle must be traded for a top 3 forward, or top 6 and a decent draft pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something had to be done.  Ian White is a bit of a tough loss since he finally played himself into a good defencemen and then the leafs trade him. Although he does pinch alot at bad times like the first shift of last nights flame&#8217;s game.  Kaberle must be traded for a top 3 forward, or top 6 and a decent draft pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Take 6 on Week 6 by Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=633&#038;cpage=1#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 22:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=633#comment-139</guid>
		<description>Fun stat: the number of touchdowns thrown by Tom Brady in the second quarter of the game was greater than the combined quarterback rating of both of Tennessee&#039;s quarterbacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fun stat: the number of touchdowns thrown by Tom Brady in the second quarter of the game was greater than the combined quarterback rating of both of Tennessee&#8217;s quarterbacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fulham adds to Hull City&#8217;s Early Season Struggles by chris macpherson</title>
		<link>http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=630&#038;cpage=1#comment-134</link>
		<dc:creator>chris macpherson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=630#comment-134</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m honestly shocked Phil Brown and his leathery skin still has a job to be completely honest.  After such a great start to last year&#039;s season he seems to have completely lost his grip on the game, and Hull by the looks of things will be heading back down next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m honestly shocked Phil Brown and his leathery skin still has a job to be completely honest.  After such a great start to last year&#8217;s season he seems to have completely lost his grip on the game, and Hull by the looks of things will be heading back down next year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Take 3 on the NFL&#8217;s Week 3 by Mark Sutherland</title>
		<link>http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=457&#038;cpage=1#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Sutherland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 18:52:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=457#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jay, I really shouldn&#039;t write these while researching for the pool.  I do like Drew Stafford and the Sabres though.

I really expected a lot more out of the Packers, but maybe I was just buying into the pre-season hype.  Aaron Rodgers has been getting hit hard early in the season, and if the offensive line play does not improve then I can&#039;t see him finishing the season.  I also thought their defense would play a lot better, but it hasn&#039;t really come together for them yet.  Having said that they are still 2-1, and if they can put it together this week, and beat the Vikings then they will be looking pretty.  I not ready to give up on them yet, but they have to show it to me this week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jay, I really shouldn&#8217;t write these while researching for the pool.  I do like Drew Stafford and the Sabres though.</p>
<p>I really expected a lot more out of the Packers, but maybe I was just buying into the pre-season hype.  Aaron Rodgers has been getting hit hard early in the season, and if the offensive line play does not improve then I can&#8217;t see him finishing the season.  I also thought their defense would play a lot better, but it hasn&#8217;t really come together for them yet.  Having said that they are still 2-1, and if they can put it together this week, and beat the Vikings then they will be looking pretty.  I not ready to give up on them yet, but they have to show it to me this week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Take 3 on the NFL&#8217;s Week 3 by Matthew Stafford</title>
		<link>http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=457&#038;cpage=1#comment-96</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Stafford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.frompuckstothepitch.com/?p=457#comment-96</guid>
		<description>Drew Stafford?  I know someone&#039;s sleeper pick in their NHL pool...

And are the Packers good?  They squeaked by the Bears in a game where everyone agrees the Bears were just terrible.  They lose to an improved Cincy team but at home and they beat a Rams team that everyone is going to beat.  What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drew Stafford?  I know someone&#8217;s sleeper pick in their NHL pool&#8230;</p>
<p>And are the Packers good?  They squeaked by the Bears in a game where everyone agrees the Bears were just terrible.  They lose to an improved Cincy team but at home and they beat a Rams team that everyone is going to beat.  What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
